KERNERSVILLE, N.C. — Federal Express Corporation, formerly known as FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., violated federal law by failing to provide reasonable accommodations to blind employees at its Kernersville, North Carolina facility, the U.S. Equal Employment...
ATLANTA — Safelite Fulfillment, LLC, the largest auto glass repair company in the United States, violated federal law by refusing to hire qualified female applicants nationwide for technician positions because of their sex, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity...
ATLANTA — Reynolds IGA Foodliner, Inc., owner and operator of a chain of restaurants and grocery stores, violated federal law when it refused to reasonably accommodate a Piggly Wiggly employee’s request to refrain from working on Sundays, then fired her, the U.S....
LYNCHBURG, Va. — The Salvation Army, headquartered in Virginia with a facility in Lynchburg, violated federal law when it discriminated against an employee by denying her a reasonable accommodation to seek treatment for cancer and caused her to be separated from her...
Illinois enacted the Family Neonatal Intensive Care Leave Act (Public Act 104‑0259), creating a new category of unpaid, job-protected leave for employees whose child is in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The law introduces a separate leave entitlement with...
On May 14, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) submitted a proposed rule to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), part of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), titled “Rescission of EEO-1, EEO-2, EEO-3, EEO-4, EEO-5, and...
The Supreme Court of the United States’ opinion in Blanche v. Lau, No. 25-429 (June 23, 2026), reshapes how border officers may treat returning green card holders suspected of having committed offenses that would render them inadmissible. The ruling is important for...
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) guidelines regarding disparate impact liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are inconsistent with the statute and raise serious constitutional concerns, the U.S. Department of Justice said...
Leaving a meeting early can signal status, priority or disengagement, even when the reason is ordinary. Leaders should make exit norms clearer. The post Why Everyone Notices Who Leaves The Meeting First first appeared on Employment Law Information Network.
Disclaimer: This page may include a combination of original NHRMA content and articles aggregated from third-party sources and public agencies. External content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Views expressed in third-party articles do not necessarily reflect the positions of NHRMA. All third-party materials remain the property of their respective owners. Read Full Blog Policies